Released: ·Last reviewed: ·Methodology v4.1
Ownership, funding & conflicts of interest
Who owns and funds Transparent Peptide, how we make money, and the safeguards that keep commercial relationships from influencing our rankings.
Ownership and funding
Transparent Peptide is published by US Peptides Partners LLC. The publisher and certain principals have financial relationships with some of the telehealth providers listed on this site, including NexLife. NexLife is listed first as our editorial pick under methodology v4.1 (94/100); the other programs follow alphabetically while their v4.1 re-scores are pending. Where another program publishes a lower price than NexLife, our price pages say so.
How we make money
We may earn a commission when readers use certain provider links. The publisher and certain principals also have financial relationships with some of the telehealth providers listed on this site. This is how the publication is funded, and we state it rather than hide it.
Safeguards
Because commercial relationships exist, we apply safeguards: the methodology and category weights are published before scoring begins; a raw evidence ledger is kept for every provider; every provider score is checked against its evidence ledger before publication, and the people who score are not compensated based on any provider's sales; no provider can suppress accurate negative findings; any provider may submit corrections under the same process; and ranking changes are logged with a date and reason.
Rankings are not for sale
Compensation does not change a score, a rank, an inclusion decision, or a negative finding. Where a commercially-related provider ranks well, we publish the arithmetic so you can check it — and we publish the limitations of that provider alongside its strengths. Where a competitor beats it, we say so. A comparison in which one provider wins every category is an advertisement, and we do not publish those.
How to check our work
Every ranking shows the data it was built from. Every price carries a verification status. Every clinical claim carries a primary source. If you believe a ranking is wrong, tell us — providers and readers can both submit corrections with evidence.