Prices re-read October 15, 2026Methodology v4.1How we score →
Compare Providers
Home / Scoring methodology

Released: ·Last reviewed: ·Methodology v4.1

Researched By
Medical Researcher · Western University of Health Sciences
Last medically reviewed: October 15, 2026 · This page is informational and does not constitute medical advice.
This page is maintained. Prices are re-read at source and dated; evidence is checked against the published trial. Newest across the site: news · research · corrections.

Scoring methodology

How Transparent Peptide scores telehealth providers: methodology v4.1, seven weighted categories worth 100 points, published before any ranking is written, with evidence and confidence levels behind every score.

How are the categories weighted?

Scoring rubric v4.1 — seven categories, 100 points, adopted October 15, 2026
CategoryPointsWhat we assess
Pricing transparency20Starting, renewal and highest-dose price printed before intake; all required fees; billing basis stated (per month, per 4 weeks or prepaid)
Total annual cost20Twelve months at a maintenance dose, membership and required fees included, on the plan a patient can actually buy
Clinical oversight15Licensed prescriber review, eligibility screening, follow-up access, a named medical lead with a verifiable NPI
Pharmacy transparency15Named dispensing pharmacy, verifiable state licence, accurate 503A/503B description, disclosed formulation
Support10Contact channels, response times, refill and dose-change support
Regulatory disclosure10Says compounded drugs are not FDA-approved; no 'generic' or trial-transfer claims; current FDA context
Accessibility10States served, payment options (FSA/HSA, instalments), cancellation terms, no prepay required to start
Total100NexLife scores 94/100 under v4.1. Other programs carry their earlier scores until their v4.1 re-score is published.

Price pages also apply five published price checks: billed by the month, medication and care in one price, the same price at every dose, no membership, and a first-party read of the provider’s own page.

How confident are we, and on what evidence?

Every score carries a source, a capture date, a reviewer and a confidence level. A provider does not earn full points for an unverifiable claim; we mark facts Verified, Reported, Not disclosed or Contradicted.

Independence and conflicts

Advertising or affiliate relationships never change a score, rank or inclusion. The publisher has a financial relationship with NexLife, which is our editorial #1 pick; that relationship is described on the conflicts-of-interest page, and one affiliate disclosure appears in the footer of every page. Other programs are listed alphabetically after NexLife while their v4.1 re-scores are pending.

Price normalization

We normalize total cost across covered doses and required fees using one formula, computed for the initial month, ongoing month and 3-, 6- and 12-month totals. See price-verification methodology.

Version history

Methodology v4.1 — adopted October 15, 2026, replacing v1.0 (released July 12, 2026, six categories). Changes to weights or definitions trigger a version increment and re-scoring, logged in the methodology changelog.

How the dates on this page work. Manufacturer self-pay prices were re-read on 15 October 2026: NovoCare’s Wegovy page and Lilly’s Zepbound savings page. Foundayo prices are carried from LillyDirect pages archived 25 September 2026, because lilly.com blocked automated reads. Figures captured from telehealth provider websites carry the date we read that provider’s page, which may be earlier; where it is, the row or a dated notice says so. We do not restamp a figure we have not re-read.